Caitie ([info]caitiedidit) wrote,
@ 2007-08-14 18:41:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:books

Books and Hate
I really hate it when I get a good ways into a book and then I put the book down and forget about it for several months. And when I go to pick it up again, I sorta maybe kinda remember where I left off and what was going on, but I've mostly forgotten everything that came before. So I always vacillate over whether I ought to just pick up where I left off or start the whole book over again. In fact, I vacillate SO MUCH that most of the time I just never bother to finish the book! I hate that.

And right now I have no less than eight or nine unfinished books hanging over my head. Most pathetically, I cannot seem to make it through the first Spiderwick book. YEAH, I KNOW. It has like twelve pages! Like I said, totally pathetic. I need to finish the first one at least, because Kierra wants me to read them. But so far, I am unimpressed. They are obnoxious, like the Lemony Snicket books. Plus for some inane reason that is completely beyond me, I strongly associate Holly Black with Cassie Claire, so whenever I get bored of the book (which is often) I start thinking about how much I despise leather-pants-wearing!Draco and Ron-hating and everything else the stupid Draco Trilogy represents, and I get all pissed off.

And of course, since I have all of these stupid unfinished books, all I want to do is go buy brand new books! I have this kick ass Barnes & Noble coupon burning a hole in my pocket, and I am sort of in the mood for something mindless and fluffy. Like a new Princess Diaries or Stephanie Plum novel. Only, of course, I've already read all of those. So I was even sort of maybe kind of thinking I would go pick up the sexay vampire books everyone but me reads, only that would be TOTALLY MASOCHISTIC, considering:

1. I hate vampires.
2. I cannot take any book that describes itself as "burning with erotic tension" seriously.
3. Edward Cullen, quite frankly, sounds like a flaming Gary Stu, and I know that I will hate him on sight. And the fact that the author sounds like she is completely infatuated him will only serve to piss me off further.

So WHY do I want to read these books? Only because everyone else does, which is a pretty crappy reason, especially considering that I have NINE UNFINISHED BOOKS laying around the house.

Anyway, I was looking over Kierra's first school project today, and it completely warmed my heart. There was a section where she had to write about her favorite book, and she choose The Penderwicks! Which was my Christmas gift to her two years ago! And the last book we read together! We both had the flu around New Years, and I read it to her while were were sick, and I did the voices and everything!

But she has good taste, because of all the books I've read over the last two years, it's definitely one of my favorites. It originally caught my eye because it was about four sisters, but I had no idea how satisfying a read it would turn out to be. The four sisters were all great, fully-formed characters with distinct personalities, but they weren't pigeon-holed by their individual quirks. The plot follows the sisters while they spend their summer vacation at a cottage on the estate of an old, New England mansion. They befriend the lonely son of the owner and have little, moderately eventful adventures and mishaps. Even though it's set in current times (it startled me when a laptop appeared toward the end of the book!), it has a very old-fashioned feel to it. And I liked all of the cute subplots, like the oldest sister's crush on the gardener or how one of the middle sisters is constantly making-up silly Mary Sue stories in her head. I just really, really liked it. It's aimed at younger kids than the kid lit I usually read, and the story is more subdued than what's popular right now (fantasy and flashiness), but it wasn't trendy (like Spiderwick is, sigh), and the characters have really stayed with me, which is unusual nowadays. I'll definitely be picking up anything else Jeanne Birdsall writes. Consider it recommended!



(Post a new comment)


[info]themis
2007-08-14 11:54 pm UTC (link)
Edward Cullen isn't so much a Gary Stu as a dick. There's this kind of adorable Native American kid (who ends up as a werewolf, I think?). However, he is not adorable enough for me to recommend them.

It's not that they're exactly bad they're just so incredibly mediocre. They actually really frustrate me.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]caitiedidit
2007-08-15 04:19 am UTC (link)
Yeah. Everybody on my f'list seems to hate Edward Cullen and like the other guy.

Anyway, look! I gots a #33 icon too!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]bactaqueen
2007-08-15 12:35 am UTC (link)
2. I cannot take any book that describes itself as "burning with erotic tension" seriously.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA. The only thing better than that is "virile." SRSLY.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]caitiedidit
2007-08-15 04:25 am UTC (link)
I mean, really. These books are for teenagers! Who wants to buy their fourteen year old daughter a book that BURNS WITH EROTIC TENSION. People more sexually liberated than me, apparently.

The worst part is that I have almost bought these damn books on several separate occasions, but I keep being deterred by this or that. Last time it was the summary:

About three things I was absolutely positive:

First, Edward was a vampire.

Second, there was a part of him-–and I didn’t know how dominant that part might be–-that thirsted for my blood.

And third, I was unconditionally and irrevocably in love with him.


I mean, COME THE FUCK ON. That is hilarious. I bet these books are a treasure trove of unintentional hilarity.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]q_sama
2007-08-15 01:18 am UTC (link)
::shudder:: I hate vampire books, too. So much that I ignored a favorite author's greatest-accoladed work of fiction because it was a vampire tale. :( (for the record, I just finished it. I feel like a better person now.)

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]caitiedidit
2007-08-15 02:30 am UTC (link)
I have just never got the whole vampires = sexay thing. Mostly it just seems like an extension of the sexualization-of-violence-against-women stuff that my gender studies teachers used to bitch about. But it's more... fetishized? Is fetishized even a word?

Whatever. Hopefully you know what I mean. (Although, honestly, this is probably just another example of me demeaning things other people like that I just do not see the appeal of. It's a character flaw.)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]q_sama
2007-08-15 02:45 am UTC (link)
Hee-hee. It's a character flaw that I love.

I'm really in the same boat as you regarding the sexualization of women. I think so much of it that drives me crazy is the teenage fangirlishness of loving vampires - like it's a girl's first exploration of sexuality and it manifests itself in the form of swooniness. I wonder if there are essays/books about this - beginning with the Victorian reaction to Dracula. The Count's "attacks" on Mina and Lucy were so very sexual-but-tame compared to the more recent vampirical adventures out there.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]chocolatepot
2007-08-15 02:06 am UTC (link)
strongly associate Holly Black with Cassie Claire

Holly Black is buddies with CC. They're in a writing group together, one that includes Libba Bray (who also included CC in the dedication to Rebel Angels, ugh).

DDDDDDDDDDD:

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]caitiedidit
2007-08-15 02:21 am UTC (link)
HA! I knew it could not be for no reason!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]m00nface
2007-08-15 03:35 am UTC (link)
Thank you for the recommendation! I will totally be looking for The Penderwicks for my own little sister (also nine whole years!) who doesn't read quite as much as I'd like her to yet. If you and your sister enjoyed it, that's a pretty strong recommendation.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]caitiedidit
2007-08-15 04:40 am UTC (link)
Yay! It really is a lovely little book. And aside from that, it felt very familiar and comfortable. Jeanne Birdsall's influences (classic stuff like Louisa May Alcott, L.M. Montgomery, Jane Austen, E.B. White, E. Nesbit, Frances Hodgson Burnett, Madeline L'Engle, etc.) really show. (Not that she plagiarizes or borrows heavily or anything -- it's just the *feel* of the novel.)

(Reply to this)(Parent)


oicrylic
2007-08-16 11:36 am UTC (link)
So WHY do I want to read these books? Only because everyone else does, which is a pretty crappy reason, especially considering that I have NINE UNFINISHED BOOKS laying around the house.


Hmm... Harry Potter?

(Reply to this)


[info]keenai
2007-08-21 07:09 pm UTC (link)
See, I never finished Twilight or that one Holly Black book I tried to read. So, you know, just let it go. My thing is: if you get halfway through a book and forget to pick it up again? There's probably a good reason. And that reason is that you don't like it all that much and should move on with your life. Which it seems like you do!

So don't feel bad.

(Reply to this)


Create an Account
Forgot your login?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…